<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>eJury</title>
		<description>eJury Review</description>
		<link>http://mysurvey123.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:40:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://mysurvey123.com/index.php/Paid-Surveys-Reviews/eJury-Review.html#josc626</link>
			<description>I did a mock jury. And they paid me through paypal in less than 2 weeks.</description>
			<author>Brian</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:38:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://mysurvey123.com/index.php/Paid-Surveys-Reviews/eJury-Review.html#josc913</link>
			<description>eJury selects their panelists in relation to the case being tried.  If you live in a rather remote area, as I do, where there probably aren\'t hundreds of panelists signed up, the chance of getting picked is fairly good.  I\'ve done two cases in the last few months.  Each was similar yet with vastly different circumstances.  I don\'t imagine they want to send the same type cases over and over to the same panelist.  They\'d wind up being cookie cutter verdicts.

The time I spent on the cases was probably a lot more than they expect a panelist to spend, but I like to be thorough and analytical.  I enjoyed it so much that I didn\'t mind benefiting less than $2 for each hour I spent debating it.  There are many other survey sites out there that think your time is worth nothing or hardly anything.  eJury pays promptly by PayPal.

I hope I get another case soon!</description>
			<author>Adrienne Ostman</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:14:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hmmm?</title>
			<link>http://mysurvey123.com/index.php/Paid-Surveys-Reviews/eJury-Review.html#josc1543</link>
			<description>I really wanted to sign up to be an ejurist... but I was a bit uncomfortable with the fact that they asked me from my Driver\'s License Number on the website-- especially since the site wasn\'t secure...

Anyone else have positive feedback about the site to ease my suspicion?</description>
			<author>Mary</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:19:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
